[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: dcache problems with vfat writes:
> (Something else is that the present vfat revalidate() seems to
> cause lots of unnecessary lookups, but of course efficiency
> is a secondary concern. I would like to hear from Gordon why
> things are as they are at present.)

You run into inconsistency problems with vfat aliases. You could
be accessing a path two ways:

this/is/a long directory path/file

The problem is that a move of "a long directory path" to some other name
didn't remove the dcache entry for "alongd~1". Any time one of a file's
parents gets renamed, it needs to be revalidated. I might be overly
cautious and at some point I should probably think through this whole
thing again. When I was deep into the problem, it seemed to be the
right thing to do. Now, my thinking is more fuzzy.

- Gordon

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.070 / U:8.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site