lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Open by inode? (was Re: knfsd)
Hi!

> Is this really necessary?
>
> I've always found UNFSD quite good and featureful, and I find the way it
> resolves permissions based on path names very useful. (A feature KNFSD
> does not have).
>
> I thought the only downside to UNFSD was it's lack of threading, making
> it slow for heavy use. A clone based version would fix this, no?

I was horrified when I found out that our pentium/100 server with 5
scsi disks gives only 300K/sec with unfsd.... :-(.

Pavel

PS: I like unfsd for other purposes: Like making file ungzipping
transparent :-).
--
The best software in life is free (not shareware)! Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.082 / U:1.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site