Messages in this thread | | | From | (david parsons) | Subject | Re: proper place to discuss kernel 'bloatedness'? | Date | 31 Jan 1999 02:58:17 -0800 |
| |
In article <linux.kernel.19990129230557.S259@perlsupport.com>, Chip Salzenberg <chip@perlsupport.com> wrote: >According to Michael Loftis: >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/hda1 382M 315M 48M 87% / >> >> As you can see there's no way Linux could be compiled. This system will be >> effectively stuck at 2.0.35 forever. > >There's no reason you can't compile machine A's kernel on machine B.
Didn't he just say that this was his largest machine?
____ david parsons \bi/ Disk is cheap, but it's not that cheap. \/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |