lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux

> IOW the correct config.guess triple *should* be "x86-pc-linux". Or
> "x86-gnu-linux"; an accurate statement, since the userspace code is
> something like 85% FSF code (and this nicely ends the current argument).
> "i?86-pc-linux-gnu" is silly, and "i?86-{redhat,suse,...}-linux{,-gnu}" is
> sillier.

Not silly, but probably completely wrong. The "unknown" is the output
of the "uname -p" command on Intel/Linux machines. The configure
scripts don't do any initial tests, by assembling or compiling code,
except Alpha and MIPS. The "uname -p" option is supposed to result in
the processor, which actually (on my Pentium) is supplied by "uname
-m". If the individual distributions supply their vendor-specific
name--which has nothing to do with the libraries--then any
distribution that substitutes their own label is not POSIX compliant.
But I haven't looked at the POSIX standard at all, nor autoconf very
closely

--

Robert Kiesling
kiesling@ix.netcom.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site