lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: kmalloc
From
Date
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch> writes:

|> >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> writes:
|>
|> Andreas> alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) writes:
|> |> Thats vmalloc. If you have an architecture where kmalloc blocks are
|> |> not linear to the I/O devices
|>
|> Andreas> m68k.
|>
|> Yes but even then we do not have a granularity of memory < 256KB
|> chunks which will cause this to happen so in practice at least
|> allocations of 256KB are guaranteed to be linear on the m68k and
|> kmalloc is limited to 128KB.

Oops, yes, you're of course right.

--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de completely different"
schwab@gnu.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans