Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:09:04 +0000 ( ) | From | Aaron Lehmann <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.x and IPMasq/ipportfw |
| |
yep, my mistake. port forwarding is included but experimental, so CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (?) has to be enabled.
KeyID 1024D/73348CA0 Fingerprint 8EFC 7F10 F26C 55A8 458A 38B0 890F 384F 7334 8CA0 Public key available at http://www.vitelus.com/aaronl/pubkey.asc
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > > > I am considering upgrading to 2.2.0 in a few days. The CHANGES file has > > done a great job at scaring me. > > > > I use this machine as an IPMasqurading router. According to the ChangeLog, > > ipfwadm will break. :(. That stinks. I'll have to upgrade to IPChains, but > > the site appars to be down. > > Or has firewalled you out :) > > If you're prepared to miss out on the extra flexibility (and speed) of > ipchains, you can just drop the ipfwadm-wrapper over your ipfwadm binary > and leave it at that.. > > > I don't see an IP: Masqurading option in the kernel anymore. What happened > > to that? Is it unnecesary with IPChains? > > Nope. You have to enable "IP: Always defragment" as well as the usual > options (firewalling, IP firewalling). > > > I also have not been able to find port forwarding patches to 2.1.xxx or > > 2.2.x. Will these ever be brought back up to sync with 2.2? > > ipportfw is included in 2.2, I believe. > > Matthew. >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |