lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: glibc-2.0.110/111, apmd3.0beta4, & 2.2.0-final
    Garst R. Reese writes:
    > Ulrich Drepper wrote:
    > >
    > > "Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net> writes:
    > >
    > > > When I do that I get two messages [104] [105] about apmd exiting.
    > > > Seems to be a vfork problem. When I remove the vfork code from
    > > > 2.2.0-final by reversing the change in entry.S, all goes well.
    > >
    > > This could be what I warned about right from the beginning of the
    > > vfork discussion: incorrectly written code. Look through the sources
    > > and examine whether vfork is used according to the limitations (no
    > > return from the function calling vfork, only _exit or exec called).

    What's the word on whether system calls that manipulate FDs are OK in
    the vfork() child? For example, calling dup2()?

    Regards,

    Richard....

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.022 / U:30.196 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site