[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: arca-vm-26
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:

> - buffermem is 200M of my 256M system afterwards
> - minimum swap.
> - lots of system time searching the buffer cache with
> commands afterwards.

so the problem is just only the ~O(n) search in the buffer cache right?

> - commands running 50 to 100!!! times slower than before filling buffercache

No this is a workaround of the problem I think that right now I should
enlarge the buffer hash table of the buffer headers for high memory

Really I think that for the long run I should start dropping the cache and
buffer hashes replacing them with RB-trees to work fine everywhere without
waste some base memory with fuzzy hash tables. I think that doing that
everything should scale _far_ better also under the scenario you are

Comments from David? (note RB-trees != AVL ;).

Andrea Arcangeli

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:2.369 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site