[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Scheduler problems
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > Ingo, any thoughts? Seems that if for any reason all wakeup interrupts
> > arrive at the same CPU which is running the SCHED_FIFO task, then we
> > will _never_ perform any successful wakeups without first exhausting the
> > other CPU's current timeslice.
> yes i have a patch for this but it's not straightforward enough
> for 2.2. (ie. a 50k patch) It has to do things like a full
> goodness() run for every CPU in wakeup(), which is less than
> ideal.

I am willing to improve/maintain that patch as an add-on
feature for 2.2 -- once 2.2 stabilizes, of course...


Rik -- If a Microsoft product fails, who do you sue?
| Linux memory management tour guide. |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. |

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.046 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site