lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Building .config into the kernel
On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, G.W. Wettstein wrote:

# This should be a non-issue in my opinion. My team runs a bunch of
#
# Kernels don't get installed unless they are packed like above. This
# doesn't have the advantage of the information being physically stuck
# but I'm not sure if I see the advantage to that.

And if you don't run a distribution that keeps information about installed
package? What about that scenerio?


G'day!
-- n i c h o l a s j l e o n
elegance through simplicity*http://mrnick.binary9.net*nicholas@binary9.net
good fortune through truth*roaming:njllm@email.msn.com*ICQ#2170994*U+($++)
TRA#6805*not all questions have answers*pseudogeek:P+++($++)L+($++)W=lm@b9
trust no-one with an iq under 150*understand yourself before trying others


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.178 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site