Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:12:56 -0500 (EST) | From | "Nicholas J. Leon" <> | Subject | Re: Building .config into the kernel |
| |
On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, G.W. Wettstein wrote:
# This should be a non-issue in my opinion. My team runs a bunch of # # Kernels don't get installed unless they are packed like above. This # doesn't have the advantage of the information being physically stuck # but I'm not sure if I see the advantage to that.
And if you don't run a distribution that keeps information about installed package? What about that scenerio?
G'day! -- n i c h o l a s j l e o n elegance through simplicity*http://mrnick.binary9.net*nicholas@binary9.net good fortune through truth*roaming:njllm@email.msn.com*ICQ#2170994*U+($++) TRA#6805*not all questions have answers*pseudogeek:P+++($++)L+($++)W=lm@b9 trust no-one with an iq under 150*understand yourself before trying others
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |