Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:57:33 +0100 (CET) | From | Dag Wieers <> | Subject | Re: linux-kernel's extremely slow turnaround time |
| |
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Horst von Brand wrote: > Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org> said: > [...] > > I'm still using 1.x majordomo just like everyone else. The bottleneck is > > not calling external commands (which is primarily calling sendmail for > > message delivery, once per message), but in loading and compiling resend, > > archive, etc., repeatedly. Resend for some lists may also have to read the > > subscriber list to determine whether a post is legitimate, but this is not > > an issue for linux-kernel. Free memory helps _a lot_, as do fast disks. > How about compiling majordomo then? The latest perls have (experimental) > support for compiling to binary. if i'm not mistaken before perl4 you could convert your perl-scripts to perl-bytecode. but as perl matured that option was silently removed (because it wasn't cross-platform anymore ?) i can't find the original faq to point to ;/
dag wieers, <dag@digibel.be>, http://dag.ml.org/ _| _ _ ° we know linux is the best, it can do infinite ° (_|(_|(_| ° loops in five seconds. -- Linus Torvalds |
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |