[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: odd chown difference between 2.0 and 2.1pre kernels
> On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:40:02 +0000 (GMT),
> (Alan Cox) said:
> >> In message <>, Joey Hess writes:
> >> GAK!!! Security flaw here, methinks. chown should unconditionally clear
> >> setuid and setgid.
> > Except when done by root
> Is there any consensus on this? According to singleunix, suid and
> sgid on regular files get cleared unconditionally except when the
> caller has "appropriate privileges", but in that case the behaviour is
> implementation-defined. What do other unixen do in this case?

Everything I tested does the same thing (even Irix for once). They all
don't drop them as root.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.094 / U:22.448 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site