lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kernel Threads: Dr. Russinovich's response

In article <Pine.LNX.3.95.990112085745.1967A-100000@chaos.analogic.com> you wrote:

> Note that the so-called Doctor is probably just a pen-name he uses in

Once again, you prefer to mouth off, instead of checking
your facts first. From his web page you can see he got
his PhD from Carnegie Mellon in 1994.

Not to say his criticisms are all correct. He seems to
have overlooked the completion-port-like RT IO signals
Stephen added, for example, and his assertion that
enterprise-level servers need unlimited performance is
hard to back up. They just need to be good enough, ie
saturate the comms bandwidth available. Something I
don't think NT does.

--
Erik Corry erik@arbat.com Ceterum censeo, Microsoftem esse delendam!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.194 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site