[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Kernel Threads: Dr. Russinovich's response
    On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > The following is Dr. Russinovich's response to criticisms of his
    > > article. He points out: "I expect my criticisms will help, not
    > > hinder, efforts to get Linux ready for the enterprise" -- for this
    > > reason, I thought I'd better forward it.
    > I've already pointed out his reply is full of errors to him, and have received
    > no reply as yet.
    > Alan

    This is a no-win strawman. Basically he says that he doesn't like Unix
    or Unix-type operating systems, and that a version of Windows NT that does
    not yet exist is the only thing that will work with an undefined thing he
    calls "enterprise computing".

    Note that the so-called Doctor is probably just a pen-name he uses in
    the NT rag. He is a salesman for NT and most everybody knows NT needs
    salesmen. It doesn't run on its own merits.

    Dick Johnson
    Penguin : Linux version 2.1.131 on an i686 machine (400.59 BogoMips).
    Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology.
    Wisdom : It's not a Y2K problem. It's a Y2Day problem.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.025 / U:61.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site