Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Porting vfork() | Date | Mon, 11 Jan 1999 06:59:54 -0500 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <199901110316.WAA13036@saturn.cs.uml.edu>, "Albert D. Cahalan" write s: +----- | We might not have the details right (SIGKILL, SIGTTIN, etc.) but at | least the new vfork() is more reasonable. +--->8
IMHO vfork() is *never* reasonable....
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |