Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Jan 1999 13:44:00 -0500 (EST) | From | George <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.0pre4 detects a "166193960 Hz processor" |
| |
On 7 Jan 1999, Anders Melchiorsen wrote:
>Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@daldata.no> writes: > >> > In short, looks fine to me. Maybe not pretty, but hey, who reads bootup >> > messages anyway? >> >> I like it. If it is measured with such high precision, why not >> show it? :-) > >It isn't. The last four digits seem rather random here.
Here too.
Jan 5 06:21:30 moving kernel: Detected 232105767 Hz processor. Jan 5 06:21:30 moving kernel: ..... CPU clock speed is 232.1054 MHz. Jan 6 19:39:00 moving kernel: Detected 232109944 Hz processor. Jan 6 19:39:00 moving kernel: ..... CPU clock speed is 232.1054 MHz. Jan 6 19:51:13 moving kernel: Detected 232108565 Hz processor. Jan 6 19:51:13 moving kernel: ..... CPU clock speed is 232.1071 MHz. Jan 6 19:55:01 moving kernel: Detected 232107862 Hz processor. Jan 6 19:55:01 moving kernel: ..... CPU clock speed is 232.1078 MHz. Jan 7 18:48:29 moving kernel: Detected 232108000 Hz processor. Jan 7 18:48:29 moving kernel: ..... CPU clock speed is 232.1068 MHz. Jan 7 18:55:06 moving kernel: Detected 232106181 Hz processor. Jan 7 18:55:06 moving kernel: ..... CPU clock speed is 232.1075 MHz. Jan 8 07:02:22 moving kernel: Detected 232109681 Hz processor. Jan 8 07:02:22 moving kernel: ..... CPU clock speed is 232.1070 MHz.
The TSC and APIC disagree, but the APIC appears to be more stable.
-George
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |