lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Open by inode? (was Re: knfsd)


    On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Jamie Lokier wrote:

    > There's really no need for extra syscalls for open-by-inode.
    >
    > Implement /proc/inode/NNN instead...

    I hope you are kidding, right? Do you realize *what* size this
    thing will have? Not to mention the fact that normal semantics wrt removal
    when the last reference goes away will be killed on spot. The main problem
    with opening by inode is in interaction with dcache. You'll introduce a
    slew of races and I pity one trying to fix *that* mess. Please, don't.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.020 / U:59.892 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site