[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Open by inode? (was Re: knfsd)

On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> There's really no need for extra syscalls for open-by-inode.
> Implement /proc/inode/NNN instead...

I hope you are kidding, right? Do you realize *what* size this
thing will have? Not to mention the fact that normal semantics wrt removal
when the last reference goes away will be killed on spot. The main problem
with opening by inode is in interaction with dcache. You'll introduce a
slew of races and I pity one trying to fix *that* mess. Please, don't.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.127 / U:10.604 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site