[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: bogous binfmt_misc patch in 2.2.0-pre1
> According to Alan Cox:
> > Michael Chastain and others have been talking about this - there is a possible
> > 'solution' for 2.3.x - which is to add a
> >
> > requires CONFIG_something CONFIG_somethingelse
> >
> > at the end of the scripts.
> That may not be enough. You should consider allowing full boolean
> expressions, and/or allowing pseudo-config variables that are implied
> by others. I'm thinking of Debian's packag dependencies as a model.

You do. The test patch ends up forcing you to make oldconfig and go around and
fix stuff. The problem is deep and fundamental - you have to say what you
need not what you want. In effect configuration is upside down - and I suspect
it'll stay that way for 2.2.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.049 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site