lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Are we *really* in a feature freeze?
> > Feature freeze means as few core changes as possible.
> Nobody disagree the QNX4 fs does any harm, but a freeze is a freeze.
> Lets freeze 2.1.x ASAP with as few distractions as possible and then
> get ready for 2.3.x when we can break stuff.

That was the intent of my message really.. think about how long 2.1 has dragged
on.. and I do really mean dragged on. The 1.3 cycle was much much shorter and
right now we're in a situation where distributions are back-porting features
in 2.1 to 2.0 so they can have a stable, "current" kernel to distribute. In
an ideal beta-stable cycle, that wouldn't be needed.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:2.112 / U:0.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site