Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Sep 1998 12:32:15 -0400 | From | Aaron Tiensivu <> | Subject | Re: Are we *really* in a feature freeze? |
| |
> > Feature freeze means as few core changes as possible. > Nobody disagree the QNX4 fs does any harm, but a freeze is a freeze. > Lets freeze 2.1.x ASAP with as few distractions as possible and then > get ready for 2.3.x when we can break stuff.
That was the intent of my message really.. think about how long 2.1 has dragged on.. and I do really mean dragged on. The 1.3 cycle was much much shorter and right now we're in a situation where distributions are back-porting features in 2.1 to 2.0 so they can have a stable, "current" kernel to distribute. In an ideal beta-stable cycle, that wouldn't be needed.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html
| |