Messages in this thread |  | | | From | yodaiken@chelm ... | | Date | Fri, 4 Sep 1998 06:06:50 -0600 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower |
| |
On Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 04:24:53AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > 1) If it has balancing overhead like AVL it is not going in, this > is why Linus and I removed AVL in the first place. Lower latency > than AVL in the common case is a must.
Bruno's numbers show little cost for AVL - the common case for AVL should have no rebalancing right? Do you have different numbers?
--------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Department of Computer Science New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro NM 87801 Homepage http://www.cs.nmt.edu/~yodaiken PowerPC Linux page http://linuxppc.cs.nmt.edu Real-Time Page http://rtlinux.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html
|  |