lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower
On Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 04:24:53AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> 1) If it has balancing overhead like AVL it is not going in, this
> is why Linus and I removed AVL in the first place. Lower latency
> than AVL in the common case is a must.

Bruno's numbers show little cost for AVL - the common case for AVL should
have no rebalancing right? Do you have different numbers?


---------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Department of Computer Science
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Socorro NM 87801
Homepage http://www.cs.nmt.edu/~yodaiken
PowerPC Linux page http://linuxppc.cs.nmt.edu
Real-Time Page http://rtlinux.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans