Messages in this thread | | | From | Terry Lambert <> | Subject | Re: Differences between FreeBSD and Linux system call mechanism | Date | Thu, 3 Sep 1998 23:12:06 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> lmbench gives very precise accurate performance figures for the things > it benches - in this case things like null syscall and the affects of > the kernel cache footprint. > > When you are discussing syscall timing its syscall timing microbenchmark > is not suprisingly very accurate
What's a null system call; one that returns ENOSYS?
Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |