Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Sep 1998 14:19:35 +0000 (GMT) | From | "Glendon M. Gross" <> | Subject | Re: Linux tcp/ip code has trouble with async network I/O notificati on, |
| |
I think it's great that in such a short time you have already identified the relevant section of code to be altered. This could only happen in an open development environment.
On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > >FYI: I tried your code on linux 2.1.120pre3 -- works fine from any host I try. > > 2.1.119pre1 fails as you describe. > > Yes, even if I have not tried it in practice. Before reading your message > I just understood that the point was the `sk->data_ready(sk, 0)' in > tcp_v4_conn_request() because at that time the req->sk was still NULL > because the connection was not enstablished yet. I was searching where to > deliver the SIGIO (after the 3 way handshake when the sock is ready to > cross data) and reading the solution in pre-patch-2.1.120-3 the right > place is at the end of tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock(). > > So definetively pre-2.1.120-3 is fixed. > > I don' t know which is the state of 2.0.36xxx but sure we have to remove > the sk->data_ready(sk,0) from tcp_conn_request (and _fake()). > > Andrea[s] Arcangeli > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |