[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.1.123 and fbcon.c

    > I'll accept patches still, but I want them explained better than they have
    > been so far. So far I have one huge patch that I can look at and say "ok,
    > this won't impact me", and as such it's in theory safe to apply. However,
    > at the same time I _know_ it will impact me in the future by me just being
    > in line to get the complaints.

    [1] The remaining patches are not only bug fixes to fbcon, but mostly
    final versions of drivers as sent to me by their maintainers. I remember
    you saying that you _no_way_ want zillions of driver updates and I should
    queue them up and send as a single large patch.

    [2] Since this stuff (except for fbcon+vesafb) doesn't affect i386 at all,
    I expected you want to handle it as usual arch/ stuff, i.e. no fine-grained

    OK, I'll start with first few chunks now. Please tell me how do you like them
    before I continue.

    > I applied the generic non-driver-specific parts, and people promised me it
    > wouldn't hurt. It hurt, because it turns out that the patch contained
    > parts that _were_ driver-specific after all. Should that make me happy?

    It didn't hurt except for the fbcon stuff contained in the large patch.

    Have a nice fortnight
    Martin `MJ' Mares <>
    Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
    "May the Source be with you..."

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:2.292 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site