![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu writes: > On Sat, Sep 19, 1998 at 07:47:28AM +1000, Richard Gooch wrote: > > I'd agree with you if the heavily loaded system was just doing > > bog-standard time sharing. My concern is that if you are also trying > > to control an instrument at the same time, the schedule/wakeup times > > of the RT processes doesn't suffer because of the long run queue. > > The correct solution is RT-Linux or some variation, > not mucking up the Linux interactive scheduler. RT-Linux has it's own problems. And the change I proposed would not "muck up" the Linux scheduler. It's actually quite a simple change. Regards, Richard.... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:44 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||