![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Sep 19, 1998 at 07:47:28AM +1000, Richard Gooch wrote: > I'd agree with you if the heavily loaded system was just doing > bog-standard time sharing. My concern is that if you are also trying > to control an instrument at the same time, the schedule/wakeup times > of the RT processes doesn't suffer because of the long run queue. The correct solution is RT-Linux or some variation, not mucking up the Linux interactive scheduler. --------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Department of Computer Science New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro NM 87801 Homepage http://www.cs.nmt.edu/~yodaiken PowerPC Linux page http://linuxppc.cs.nmt.edu Real-Time Page http://rtlinux.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||