[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Speeding up FAT operations
    On Mon, 21 Sep 1998, Gordon Chaffee wrote:
    > I'm somewhat leary of applying these patches this late in 2.1.x as we
    > are trying to get 2.2 out. There are some things that are clearly not

    Yep, I'm familiar with the problems, and expect no less. In fact I wrote
    much of those patches earlier last year, but I didn't then have any
    references available to point to, so I let them be. Since the bit about
    spaces not being allowed in filenames didn't hold, it does make the rest
    relatively questionable, too, and then you have to consider that even if
    something _currently_ doesn't break it, odds are next year they'll put
    out something that does. Oh well, but that kind of thinking is the way to
    paranoia ;)

    On the other hand, if there is interest in getting these into 2.2 (I
    consider the process-load effect significant, but not critical as most
    people don't use VFAT for anything important, nor do I see any real DoS
    opportunity etc.) and the 0-ending is the only major concern (or the
    others are like that), it's actually quite cheap source- and code-wise to
    slip in a check for the 0 since the character value is being handled
    already. However, I question a bit what is the meaning of ASCIIZ string
    in a place like this because there isn't space allocated for the ending
    zero in the fields, suggesting a need for padding. I guess they could use
    0 for padding, though ;)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.018 / U:136.212 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site