Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Sep 1998 15:58:14 +0100 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: IMPORTANT: SysVinit & umounting |
| |
On Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 11:47:19PM +0200, Roderich Schupp wrote: > "Michael L. Galbraith" <mikeg@weiden.de> said: > > Well, now I know why I don't have the problem at least. Any idea why > > I don't even _have_ a map for /etc/ld.so.cache? This is sysvinit-2.74 > .... > > 40000000-40013000 r-xp 00000000 08:32 260205 /lib/ld-2.0.95.so > > The behaviour I described is for glibc-2.0.6. Maybe 2.0.95 > changes the order how to find a library (RPATH, ld.so.cache, > LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc) or dies away with the cache at all?
I don't know what the various versions of glibc do, but won't these problem go away if ld.so.cache is unmapped after reading it?
-- Jamie
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |