Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Sep 1998 12:53:13 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alex Buell <> | Subject | Re: Treat UDI like STREAMS ? |
| |
On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, Jim Freeman wrote:
> Alan writes: > > Im not interested in UDI ... > > Perhaps the kernel could treat UDI like it treats STREAMS - not > included in the kernel sources proper, but has the hooks to > accommodate the UDI framework as a loadable module? So UDI > would be available to those with a distinct need, but not the > officially sanctioned "Linux Way (tm)".
How about a UDI-loader module? That is, it is a module that loads UDIs drivers into the system. Then I can simply say 'N' to never build it. ;o)
Cheers, Alex -- /\_/\ Legalise cannabis now! ( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today! > ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.
http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk - *new* - rewritten for text browser users!
Linux tahallah 2.1.122 #43 Sat Sep 19 10:54:36 EDT 1998 One AMD 486 DX/4 processor, 49.77 total bogomips, 32M RAM
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |