Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: STREAMS: interface versus implementation | Date | Fri, 18 Sep 1998 15:39:43 +0100 | From | Tethys <> |
| |
>Once they find success in the Linux market, there will be an obvious >incentive to release subsequent products written to native Linux >networking.
This is where your argument falls down. Like you say, they're vendors. Most will take the attitude "it works now, so leave it alone".
>If any of this is a re-hash of an earlier (dramatic?) STREAMS thread >on this list (I'm sorry to have missed it), I well and truly apologize >for wasting your bandwidth.
Yes, it is. See your local lkml archive for details. As a good starting point, see Alan Cox's message from 29th Jun this year.
Tet
-- ``Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils'' - General George Stark --------------------+--------------+---------------------------------------- tethys@ml.com | Micro$oft: | Linux, the choice of a GNU generation. tet@astradyne.co.uk | Just say no! | See http://www.uk.linux.org for details
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |