lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: STREAMS: interface versus implementation
Date
From

>Once they find success in the Linux market, there will be an obvious
>incentive to release subsequent products written to native Linux
>networking.

This is where your argument falls down. Like you say, they're vendors.
Most will take the attitude "it works now, so leave it alone".

>If any of this is a re-hash of an earlier (dramatic?) STREAMS thread
>on this list (I'm sorry to have missed it), I well and truly apologize
>for wasting your bandwidth.

Yes, it is. See your local lkml archive for details. As a good starting
point, see Alan Cox's message from 29th Jun this year.

Tet

--
``Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils'' - General George Stark
--------------------+--------------+----------------------------------------
tethys@ml.com | Micro$oft: | Linux, the choice of a GNU generation.
tet@astradyne.co.uk | Just say no! | See http://www.uk.linux.org for details

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.168 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site