lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Non-urgent issue with fs/isofs/util.c
In <19980918151457.C9740@harvestroad.com.au>, on 09/18/98 
at 03:14 PM, Ian McKellar <imckellar@harvestroad.com.au> said:


>Hi,

>The iso_date function in fs/isofs/util.c doesn't correctly handle leap
>years.

>Well, it doesn't handle the year 2100 - which according to the code is a
>leap year, but according to the commonly accepted rules is not.

>I don't think we need to be to concerned right now, but changing:
> if (((year+2) % 4) == 0 && month > 2)
>to:
> if (((year+2) % 4) == 0 && month > 2 && year != 130) should
>fix it.
The equivalent code
if (!((year+2) & 3) && month > 2 && year != 130) is probably
faster. The somewhat expensive mod operator is
replaced by a bitwise "and", that is faster on most platforms.

Helge Hafting
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
helge.hafting@daldata.no
-----------------------------------------------------------


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.053 / U:3.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site