Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Sep 1998 12:55:37 -0600 | From | PJ <> | Subject | Re: Crash report 2.1.120 |
| |
> Process // > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > Code: 89 10 85 d2 74 03 89 42 04 b8 01 00 00 00 c7 43 04 00 00 00 > Aiee, killing interrupt handler > Those number are exactly as shownn .. the rest is of the screen and I can't scroll it up. > The machine is rock solid. > Compiled with egcs-1.03....
Ok, I finally got an EIP ! Traced it into system map as smp_local_timer_interrupt. This was a different crash thatn the one above but probably of same origin.
I have now applied 2.1.121 and 2.1.122 and recompiled WITHOUT SMP by commenting it out of the makefile.
So far no crash... I'll send this off before I try to force it. Whats the reasoning for not having SMP as a config option ??
somewhere else in the kernel source code I can find the words "to protect the innocent" with regards to a feature being disabled.
Either way I still think this is a bug. I don't have a multiprocessor machine, but the kernel should not freak thinking I do.
Peter -- pjordan at blackwire.com 436-0829 Black Wire Media "The meaning of a value is determined by how it is used" : Ousterhout
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |