lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Crash report 2.1.120
> Process //
> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> Code: 89 10 85 d2 74 03 89 42 04 b8 01 00 00 00 c7 43 04 00 00 00
> Aiee, killing interrupt handler
> Those number are exactly as shownn .. the rest is of the screen and I can't scroll it up.
> The machine is rock solid.
> Compiled with egcs-1.03....


Ok, I finally got an EIP !
Traced it into system map as smp_local_timer_interrupt.
This was a different crash thatn the one above but probably of same origin.

I have now applied 2.1.121 and 2.1.122 and recompiled WITHOUT SMP
by commenting it out of the makefile.

So far no crash...
I'll send this off before I try to force it.
Whats the reasoning for not having SMP as a config option ??

somewhere else in the kernel source code I can find the words
"to protect the innocent" with regards to a feature being disabled.

Either way I still think this is a bug. I don't have a multiprocessor machine,
but the kernel should not freak thinking I do.

Peter
--
pjordan at blackwire.com 436-0829 Black Wire Media
"The meaning of a value is determined by how it is used" : Ousterhout





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.139 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site