Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Sep 1998 10:42:38 -0700 | From | Richard Henderson <> | Subject | Re: egcs-1.1 (was 2.0.36-pre9 |
| |
On Tue, Sep 15, 1998 at 04:17:01PM +1200, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > Oh, no doubt about it - my alpha source tree is full of small hacks > because I'm too lazy to get a real egcs (egcs on my alpha is really > broken).
Define "really broken".
> This reminds me, __builtin_return_address is real pain in places, is > there anyone where absolutely need this, it seems evil at best and it > might be nice to eradicate it completely from the kernel.
__builtin_return_address(0) is the best way to get that data. I believe it to be working in all situations now (except for MIPS). What are your specific beefs?
> No doubt rth has also read these comments and hopefully will pass on > any relevant parts to the right people, he's also going to be much > better qualified than myself and spotting what's an egcs problem and > what's not.
FYI, don't bet on me seeing anything on l-k, as I don't scan it that often. And even in this case I didn't catch whatever part of this thread may have listed specifics.
r~
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |