Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Sep 1998 10:07:29 +0200 | From | Martin Mares <> | Subject | Re: GPS Leap Second Scheduled! |
| |
> > Of course, the most obvious mistake is using UTC to measure the time > > between events, and that'll just keep on being made. > > Of course, which is why it is important that one can get either UTC > or TAI from whatever format applies.
I'm not sure whether there are more programs which break down time() values manually (as said by POSIX) or programs which use time() for measuring time between events. Breaking the latter case seems to be more problematic in my eyes...
Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth "New PC concept: "plug and pray""
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |