lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 14 Sep 1998 11:45:30 +0100
From"Stephen C. Tweedie" <>
SubjectRe: slowdown 2.0.35 vs 2.1.121 (pre 1)
Hi,

On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:50:21 +0100, Simon Kenyon <simon@koala.ie> said:

> built 2.1.121 while running 2.0.34 and then built it again (after doing make
> clean; make xconfig; make dep) on top of the 2.1.121 previously built

> there was a 6% slowdown 9:14 vs 8:51
> is this to be expected?

> i know the test was a bit rough and ready
> is 6% statistically significant?

You tell us: run the test a couple of more times and _then_ we can tell
you what is noise in the measurement and what is significant. :)

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [from the cache]
©2003-2010