[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.1.121 breaks compilation, initmem_freed undefined

On Sun, 13 Sep 1998, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Checking for a module is not an option here. This is kernel code that may be
> called before or after the free_initmem() call. We just have to know what's the
> case here...

Then it had better not depend on any __init data structures, now had it?

I'm extremely disappointed with people doing completely stupid things.
Just get rid of the effing logo, and be done with it.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.053 / U:12.912 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site