[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)
    > People keep proposing bandaid solutions that only treat the
    > symptoms.

    Yes, unfortunately devfs is exactly that.

    > Device files are a namespace used to access kernel drivers, not just
    > an ordinary collection of files. There is a fundamental difference here.
    > It is critical that /dev be perfectly synchronized with the kernel.

    Actually, /dev *IS* just an ordinary collection of files. Yes, it has
    to match the kernel. So do libc, kmod, automount, and a gazillion
    other things. Putting it in kernel space is a quick, dirty hack.

    > Preferably, /dev is also synchronized with the hardware.

    There is no need for this; it needs to be synchronized with the drivers.

    > How would an anti-devfs person support USB? Remember, the whole system
    > is dynamic. You can add and remove devices on a live system. You can
    > have several devices of the same type, there is no adjustable ID like
    > SCSI has... It will put you through hell.

    Do it like PCMCIA, which already supports this kind hot-plugging quite
    nicely thankyouverymuch. Hot-plugging is a heck of a lot more than
    device nodes, which is exactly why so many of the pro-devfs arguments
    are fundamental fallacies.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.020 / U:20.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site