[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)
    In article <>,
    Terry L Ridder <> wrote:
    >Companies want/desire/demand/need simple answers and dev_fs is not a
    >answer. They read the FAQ and run screaming away because of the naming

    Companies like Oracle that have engineered some of the most refined database
    software in the world cannot understand the devfs naming scheme? It's
    almost the same as the Solaris / Unixware naming scheme, guess Oracle
    won't run on those OSes either then.

    I like devfs. I tried it this week for the first time and the naming
    scheme with subdirectories per device type and devices only showing up
    when they actually exist is like having a breath of fresh air.

    Miquel van Smoorenburg | Our vision is to speed up time, | eventually eliminating it. <*>

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.021 / U:18.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site