lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.0.x SMP performances compared to 2.1.x
From
Date
Harald Hoyer <HarryH@Royal.Net> writes:

> So you may try the patch applied. It turns off all interrupts that have no
> handler.
> It also shows you the complete interrupt listing, so you may identify
> interrupts, that occured and have no handler.
>
> Good luck,
> Harald


Hi,

We ran the test again with kernel 2.1.119 without the patch
and with the patch. We did not see any difference in terms of
performances and we did not see any report of interrupts being
disabled (or cleared). So the problem does not seem to be
coming from an interrupts flooding.

Thanks for your help,

Claude


--
Claude Gamache, CAE Electronique Ltee, 8585 Cote-de-Liesse
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada H4T 1G6
Email: cgamache@cae.ca Tel.: (514) 341-2000 x3194

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.062 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site