Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: 2.1.114 linux/include/linux/sched.h problem - followup | Date | Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:22:33 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> >compilation for the non-SMP case. What's the correct fix? > >Unconditionally define INIT_LOCKS to be SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED? > > Nope. That won't cut it. DaveM's comment about some versions of gcc > dumping core when an empty structure constant is parsed at the end of > a large top level structure initialization definitely applies to > gcc-2.7.2.3. gcc-2.8.1 is fine, and I would assume that egcs compilers > are probably ok as well.
Since our string code is still capable of generating invalid code with gcc 2.8.1/egcs that doesn't seem to be a valid answer either ;)
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |