lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.1.114 linux/include/linux/sched.h problem - followup
Date
> >compilation for the non-SMP case.  What's the correct fix?
> >Unconditionally define INIT_LOCKS to be SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED?
>
> Nope. That won't cut it. DaveM's comment about some versions of gcc
> dumping core when an empty structure constant is parsed at the end of
> a large top level structure initialization definitely applies to
> gcc-2.7.2.3. gcc-2.8.1 is fine, and I would assume that egcs compilers
> are probably ok as well.

Since our string code is still capable of generating invalid code with
gcc 2.8.1/egcs that doesn't seem to be a valid answer either ;)

Alan



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.041 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site