lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Useless smbfs !
Shaw Carruthers wrote:

> I had CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y which does not fix the problem
>
> but
>
> smbmount \\\\gillian.leinster\\gillc XXXXXXXX -c "mount /GILLC -f 3666"
>
> does.
>
> So CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y does not enable?
>
> Aug 26 21:18:03 shawc kernel: SMBFS: Using core getattr (Win 95 speedup)

Hi Shaw,

Using -f 3666 should enable both the w95 base workaround and the core getattr
option. The selection code looks like this:#ifdef CONFIG_SMB_WIN95
mnt->version |= SMB_FIX_WIN95;
#endif
mnt->file_mode &= (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO);
mnt->file_mode |= S_IFREG;
mnt->dir_mode &= (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO);
mnt->dir_mode |= S_IFDIR;
sb->u.smbfs_sb.mnt = mnt;
/*
* Display the enabled options
*/
if (mnt->version & SMB_FIX_WIN95)
printk("SMBFS: Win 95 bug fixes enabled\n");
if (mnt->version & SMB_FIX_OLDATTR)
printk("SMBFS: Using core getattr (Win 95 speedup)\n");
so you should see _both_ messages.

The SMB_FIX_OLDATTR flag was supposed to be an optional speed-up at the
expense of less information. Are you saying w95 works only if this is
enabled?

Regards,
Bill







-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.193 / U:0.600 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site