[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Useless smbfs !
Shaw Carruthers wrote:

> I had CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y which does not fix the problem
> but
> smbmount \\\\gillian.leinster\\gillc XXXXXXXX -c "mount /GILLC -f 3666"
> does.
> So CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y does not enable?
> Aug 26 21:18:03 shawc kernel: SMBFS: Using core getattr (Win 95 speedup)

Hi Shaw,

Using -f 3666 should enable both the w95 base workaround and the core getattr
option. The selection code looks like this:#ifdef CONFIG_SMB_WIN95
mnt->version |= SMB_FIX_WIN95;
mnt->file_mode &= (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO);
mnt->file_mode |= S_IFREG;
mnt->dir_mode &= (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO);
mnt->dir_mode |= S_IFDIR;
sb->u.smbfs_sb.mnt = mnt;
* Display the enabled options
if (mnt->version & SMB_FIX_WIN95)
printk("SMBFS: Win 95 bug fixes enabled\n");
if (mnt->version & SMB_FIX_OLDATTR)
printk("SMBFS: Using core getattr (Win 95 speedup)\n");

so you should see _both_ messages.

The SMB_FIX_OLDATTR flag was supposed to be an optional speed-up at the
expense of less information. Are you saying w95 works only if this is


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.069 / U:1.684 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site