[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: counters that wrap around
    On Tue, Aug 25, 1998 at 05:54:27PM -0500, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:

    > Since it's so cheap, is there any real reason to replace all those
    > counters with u64's and add support for printing them?

    Many counters are 32-bits, and IMO that's fine.

    I have applications that read many hundreds of 32-bit counters every
    few minutes, and the overflow is trivially handled there.

    In the kernel, there is perhaps the odd place a 64-bit counter might
    be necessary, but certainly, most counters don't need to be.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.019 / U:189.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site