[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: copy_from_user() fixu
Chris Wedgwood writes:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 1998 at 06:21:11PM +1000, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Sigh. I should have put a smiley there.
> No. Smilies are only for humor challenged (of fuck, how PC is that?)
> and thin skinned people. Don't be a moron - smilies suck.
> > I'm staring at the read(2) man page for Solaris 2.5 and it talks
> > about EFAULT. I don't see where it implies that EFAULT is optional.
> Solaris != POSIX

Yes, I know that. But in the context of the science I'm doing, a pure
POSIX-only system is not useful. A Unix system, however, is
useful. And one of my points is that most (all?) existing Unix systems
have EFAULT, and we should avoid diverging from that behaviour.

I have no problem with optional SEGV behaviour. But to abolish EFAULT
is a Bad Thing.

> POSIX/Unix98 say that if the pointer is bogus, the behavour is
> undefined. Solaris goes further to defined this behaviour as
> returning EFAULT.

Solaris and every other Unix I've come across.

> You could write GoochOS and have it defined appropriate behaviour as
> execve("rm",{"-rf","/*"}) if you wanted to.

Bugger that! That's not useful to me. Unix is useful, and being
compatibile with Unix practice is useful.

> I think hpa argument is because POSIX/whatever don't define EFAULT as
> _required_ behaviour, its not correct to write code assuming
> otherwise just because some OSs do otherwise.

But since most (all?) Unix systems have EFAULT, is it wise to deviate
from that? Espectially considering that EFAULT is actually *useful*
and is *used in real life*.

> > You haven't responded to this part. Wrapping *every* call to
> > read(2) with a signal/setjmp save/restore is a performance killer.
> > Can you actually be serious that an application/library that tries
> > to trap bad addresses has to put up with this?
> wrapping libc sucks badly. I did this trying to work out how often
> read/write were called and and how often the buffes were page
> aligned, and it noticably slowed down some applications... (results
> were logged, so each syscall became several).

Agreed! Having to save/restore signal handlers for SEGV will kill
performance. Been there, done that.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.076 / U:1.468 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site