Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. J. Lu" <> | Subject | Re: NFS file locking broken (take 2) | Date | Sun, 23 Aug 1998 02:20:10 -0700 (PDT) |
| |
> > > > On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Steven N. Hirsch wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > > > Which one are you using? The latest one is knfsd-980820. NFS lock > > > works for me. BTW, you did apply my kernel patch, didn't you. > > > > Yes, we have E-Mail time-warp in operation. I built 2.1.117 with your > > patches from knfsd-980820, and the client-side locking now seems to work > > as it should. However, processes running on the _server_ do not see the > > locks. > > > > - Is this expected? > > - Can it be fixed? > > Well, it's not completely fixed. Locking between two processes on the > same client works, but processes on other _clients_ also fail to see them > :-(. >
It works for me very well. You must have a strange setup.
> I notice that nothing is appearing in the /var/lib/nfs/sm directories now. > Previously, there was some information which tracked clients with interest > in current locks. >
On my server:
# ls -l /var/lib/nfs/sm total 0 -rw------- 1 root root 0 Aug 22 11:36 client 1 IP -rw------- 1 root root 0 Aug 22 11:36 client 2 IP
On my client 1:
# ls -l /var/lib/nfs/sm total 0 -rw------- 1 root root 0 Aug 23 08:01 server IP
On my client 2:
# ls -l /var/lib/nfs/sm total 0 -rw------- 1 root root 0 Aug 23 08:01 server IP
BTW, there is no lock at this time.
H.J.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |