[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: pre egcs-1.1 testing and Linux 2.1.x

    On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Philip Blundell wrote:
    > >No. They should turn off optimization to be sure to not generate buggy
    > >code.
    > But the whole regparm thing is just an optimisation in itself. You are
    > suggesting that many optimisations should be disabled just so that this single
    > one doesn't fail in a particular case.

    Umm.. Did you not follow the discussion where the _same_ bug could be
    triggered even without regparm?

    It's really not regparm that is buggy at all, the problem is that gcc can
    end up doing bad things under heavy register pressure on a small-register
    machine like the x86.

    The regparm thing has been singled out because it makes it easier to show
    the bugs, not because of any technical reasons. And that's why it's so
    wrong to disable it, and hiding the real problem.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.021 / U:23.528 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site