[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [discussion] Swap overcommitment recovery
Rik van Riel <> said:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, Itai Nahshon wrote:


> > Really, programs which use the standard malloc calls cannot
> > do much on SIGDANGER but to be nice and exit, or bee bad and
> > keep all their resources.

> Sending SIGDANGER is a good idea. Not killing programs with
> a SIGDANGER handler is, IMNSHO, a bad idea. We could give programs
> which clean up 'on their own' a large bonus though (2x or 4x
> less 'kill points').

OK, so a program does:

for(;;) {

to save itself from being killed...
Dr. Horst H. von Brand
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.053 / U:24.536 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site