lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Sockets permanently in CLOSE_WAIT state.
Andy Sloane wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 18, 1998 at 12:45:21AM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
>
> > Reread your TCP books.
> > It's perfectly normal. Unless the sockets remain in CLOSE_WAIT more than say
> > 15 minutes...
>
> I'm well aware of the purpose of the CLOSE_WAIT state.
> tcp 1 0 aikon.incarnate.n:30687 aikon.incarnate.n:31337 CLOSE_WAIT
> tcp 1 0 aikon.incarnate.n:30655 aikon.incarnate.n:31337 CLOSE_WAIT
> tcp 1 0 aikon.incarnate.n:30625 aikon.incarnate.n:31337 CLOSE_WAIT
> tcp 1 0 aikon.incarnate.n:30562 aikon.incarnate.n:31337 CLOSE_WAIT
> tcp 1 0 aikon.incarnate.n:30501 aikon.incarnate.n:31337 CLOSE_WAIT
>
> These five sockets have been stuck in their state for about five
> hours now, and the process that controls them has been dead for as long.
> I've gone over my process list several times looking for the offending
> threads.

I stand corrected. I'll never skim through posts and read TIME_WAIT where
CLOSE_WAIT is written. This is definitely not normal.

Phil.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:2.182 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site