Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Aug 1998 15:10:16 -0400 (EDT) | From | William Stearns <> | Subject | Re: > 256FD Patch for 2.0.35 |
| |
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Leonard N. Zubkoff wrote:
> Can someone please point me to the canonical "> 256FD Patch" for 2.0.35? I > looked in a couple places and didn't find a 2.0.35 version. Thanks.
I got mine from ftp.is.co.za/linux/local/kernel . The documentation for v8.01 talks about patching 2.0.34, but unless I, too, have hit a bad sector in wetware, it patches cleanly against 2.0.35. It might be worth at least updating the documentation to reflect that - oskar? Cheers, - Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unix _is_ user friendly. It's just very selective about who its friends are. And sometimes even best friends have fights. William Stearns (wstearns@pobox.com) Mason, buildkernel, and named2hosts are at: http://www.pobox.com/~wstearns ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |