[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: DevFS vs. normal /dev (was DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???))
    Jochen Heuer writes:
    > On Mon, Aug 10, 1998 at 03:57:04PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
    > > Peter Hawkins <> said:
    > [...]
    > > How do you reference, say, /dev/fd0 if the floppy module isn't even loaded?
    > > You need to do that so kmod loads the module, as things stand now.
    > This is the biggest problem I see with the current devfs. While it
    > loads many modules correct it does not work for all modules which
    > are supported by devfs if they are loaded.

    No, no, no! That's getting into policy! We want to minimise policy in
    the kernel.

    > Try a _ls -l /dev/ide/_ with ide-disk, ide-mod and ide-probe as modules.
    > It does not work. There should be some reference to the module name
    > in devfs. E.g. /dev/ide/hd would load the module ide-disk. Or
    > /dev/sr would load sr_mod. Btw. maybe it is time to rename some modules
    > and find a standard name style. If I think of the modules

    All you need is a properly configured /etc/modules.conf with the right
    aliases. For example:

    alias sr sr_mod
    alias ide/hd ide-cd

    and so on. Ideally, I'd like to prepend some special string (say
    "/dev/") to the names passed to kmod to reserve a "namespace" for
    devfs and avoid any possible conflicts.

    Richard: are you happy to include a set of aliases with modutils that
    does this? If so I'll start collating names.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.020 / U:40.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site