Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Aug 1998 20:23:33 +0200 (CEST) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: is this fs corruption? |
| |
On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>care of every possible upgrade. The next week I' ll try a fsck -f. If
root@dragon:~# fsck -f /dev/hda1 Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98) e2fsck 1.12, 9-Jul-98 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information /dev/hda1: 84098/462848 files (7.8% non-contiguous), 1526050/1846624 blocks root@dragon:~# fsck -f /dev/hda3 Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98) e2fsck 1.12, 9-Jul-98 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information /dev/hda3: 1463/206040 files (27.8% non-contiguous), 577601/822528 blocks
Everything is fine after some days of _heavy_ use. So I dubit on a problem of the fs subsystem not IDE related. gcc is 2.8.1.
>everything will be OK I' ll return to enable DMA to try to reproduce. I
Now I am running again with UDMA and I' ll return to run a fsck by hand the next week, to see if there will be again sign of fs corruption.
Andrea[s] Arcangeli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |