Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 01 Aug 1998 17:47:16 +0000 | From | Paolo Losi <> | Subject | kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) |
| |
Hello everyone, these are the results obtained doing a full kernel compile after a reboot (make dep,make clean,make bzImage) on a P166MMX 64Mb RAM IDE DMA hd:
linux 2.0.36pre1+Jumbo9 524.54user 47.96system 10:35.29elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (261405major+309077minor)pagefaults 0swaps
linux 2.0.113 525.66user 39.60system 10:25.49elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (261096major+309034minor)pagefaults 0swaps
can we say that, as far as the sub-systems involved are concerned, 2.1 is 20% faster than 2.0? Thanks Paolo Losi
losi@altrimedia.it
P.S. if you need any replay from me please CC to me directly.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |