lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectkernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB)
Hello everyone,
these are the results obtained doing a full kernel compile after a
reboot (make dep,make clean,make bzImage) on a P166MMX 64Mb RAM IDE DMA
hd:

linux 2.0.36pre1+Jumbo9
524.54user 47.96system 10:35.29elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (261405major+309077minor)pagefaults
0swaps

linux 2.0.113
525.66user 39.60system 10:25.49elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (261096major+309034minor)pagefaults
0swaps

can we say that, as far as the sub-systems involved are concerned, 2.1
is 20% faster than 2.0?
Thanks
Paolo Losi

losi@altrimedia.it

P.S. if you need any replay from me please CC to me directly.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.034 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site